Clear and Fertilize, a programme providing support for forest production and management
Active and professional forest management pays off. CELPA is working in partnership with producers, forestry service providers and with the timber industry to implement a programme covering almost 250,000 acres (100,000 hectares). The result will be an increase in timber production within that area but with a lower fire risk.
The Clear and
Fertilize programme, promoted by the Paper Industry Association (CELPA), forms
part of the Better Eucalyptus project. António Macedo, who is in charge of implementing the programme, is a man
whose life and work are connected with the forest. He worked as a forest
engineer at Soporcel for 18 years (1985-2002), where he headed up the Forest
Management Planning Office. From 2002 to 2005 he was the director-general of
Forestry (DGF and DGRF) and the director of the Biomass and Energy Centre
[Centro de Biomassa e Energia (CBE)]. From 2005 he worked as a consultant at
several companies in the forestry sector, and after 2009 took on the
Administration of Metacortex. In February of 2013 he was elected chairman of
the Engineering Association’s Forest Engineering College. He has worked with
CELPA since January 2017, when he was invited to join and coordinate a more
operational dimension of CELPA’s Better Eucalyptus programme, in order to
extend the outreach of its technical support structure to private individuals.
António Macedo explains the Clear and Fertilize
initiative and the reasons why it was created. “The hangover after the forest
fires of 2017 led to apathy, a total lack of interest and a withdrawal of
investment by many forest owners and producers. Furthermore, forest reform was
passed that penalised and discredited the eucalyptus tree”. He tells us how
those who work on the ground know that many people lost their enthusiasm for
working the forest. They now prefer to hand over or sell their land. A hefty
proportion of owners were already failing to comply with minimal forest
management standards and good practices, and following 2017 this situation only
worsened.
Portuguese
industry lacks timber
The lack of
timber is a problem, and the increased and perceived risk by owners associated
with investing in forestry is not helping. It’s a worrying situation for CELPA
and for the industry. A plot which should hold 100 trees is only holding 50,
even on fertile ground, as a result of the forest being neglected and good
practices not being applied on the ground.
Simple procedures with no red tape, which respect owners’ autonomy
As well as the
devastation of eucalyptus forests caused by the 2017 fires, there are also
pests and diseases which affect productivity. António Macedo coordinates an Iberia-wide plan of action to fight and
control the eucalyptus weevil (Gonipterus platensis), which also affects
eucalyptus tree productivity. If we add to these factors the legal limitations
and restrictions on planting, we end up with a scenario where there is a highly
problematic imbalance between timber production and consumption.
Goals of the Clear and Fertilize programme
1. Reduce the risk of forest fire and pests, increasing the eucalyptus forest’s resistance and resilience by controlling vegetation and selecting saplings.
2. Increasing productivity of privately-owned eucalyptus, by encouraging forest management using good practices, but also by promoting investment with a view to achieving greater profitability.
3. Improving relations with stakeholders and ensuring better public opinion, by cultivating a better image for the tree species.
4. Promoting forest management and certification with owners and the organisations which represent them.
Promoting
forest management by owners
An owner of a
forest mini-holding with a small plot of land generally does nothing to improve
it. Some of the rationale behind this outlook is: “If I’m lucky I may just get
by – I didn’t invest anything but I still managed to make some money; however,
if there’s a fire I won’t have lost much because I didn’t spend anything.” In order to fight against this inertia and
lack of interest, the industry decided to support the sector in promoting good
practices and increasing forest owners’ productivity. It was against this
background that the Better Eucalyptus project arose in 2015. It was important
to understand the best way to convey knowledge to owners. An information
website was created, and 15 excellent videos produced detailing best forestry
practices and different operations. Sessions were held up and down the country.
It was a worthy effort but it needed to go further, with forest management
operations actually implemented, together with owners employing good practices
from a more operational standpoint. As António Macedo says, “Anyone can pay lip service, but it’s more difficult to
actually do what needs to be done. Talk is cheap”.
Models of
cooperation with forestry management bodies were tested on the ground
throughout 2017. Pilot projects were trialled, with the prior knowledge that
these experiments may not be a total success but would indicate the path that
needed to be taken and the best way to support forest owners. The projects were
carried out in the region of mini-holdings in Cantanhede, where half the
district’s plots of land averaged about two and a half acres (one hectare). This
can be transposed to this entire region. The pilot project was assisted by an
association of forest producers.
The second pilot
project was held in the area of Abrantes with Sociedade Gestiverde, which
manages a Forest Intervention Zone [Zona de Intervenção Florestal (ZIF)], and
which knows the area of intervention, the land and the owners.
António Macedo acknowledges that not many signed up
to this initiative, partly owing to the kind of measures proposed and to the
contractual requirements. On top of this, there were the fires of 2017, which
laid waste to two thirds of the ZIF in Abrantes and all of Cantanhede.
Focusing on a
model of proximity
The aim was to
learn from past mistakes in encouraging proximity and building closer ties with
forest producers and owners, based on the Growth Sul programme which aimed to
increase productivity and resilience to fire. The initiative came to CELPA’s
attention. The process was a simple one: owners had to invest to control
vegetation, and adjust densities and fuel management, and in return they would
receive investment to fertilize their cleared land.
As well decreasing the fire risk, the programme also allows productivity to be increased
The initiative,
which was implemented at the start of 2018 in the districts of Monchique,
Odemira and Aljezur, was welcomed by owners, with 104 of them signing up and an
area of intervention of almost 2,500 acres (1,002 hectares). Three service
providers also joined up to help implement the Growth Sul programme. The way in
which the model was received was the spark that ignited CELPA’s desire to roll
it out to other areas. “We liked the concept. We understood that we needed to
test this model on mini-holdings, starting with pilot projects in the districts
of Cantanhede, Anadia and Águeda.”
In addition,
they understood that they couldn’t just involve forest producer associations,
and would have to extend their remit to include timber suppliers and service
providers. António tells us “These bodies are able
to reach many smaller owners and can help in growing the network of partners
involved”, and emphasises that “where there’s business to be done, the emphasis
is different, and there is a different impetus”.
Eligibility criteria of eucalyptus areas
• Pure eucalyptus population;
• Area suitable for eucalyptus;
• Population age range from 2 to 6 years, preferably until the 3rd rotation;
• Densities of populations (>800 living stumps);
• Areas with no environmental restraints, particularly on fertilization;
• Areas of over 0.6 acres (0.25 hectares) per plot;
• Priority and upscaling of forest certification;
• Owner’s commitment to clearing land and selecting saplings,
in accordance with the technical recommendation of the Better Eucalyptus Project.
Over four weeks,
with four partners taking part (loggers, service providers and forest producer
associations) almost 500 acres (over 200 hectares) were identified as being
suitable for hosting the programme. Work was carried out on 370 acres (150
hectares), corresponding to 48 plots of land on the spot, the smallest of which
was one acre. The owners cleared their land, and in return were offered
fertilizer and its application. António Macedo
says that “Everyone was happy”.
According to
CELPA, the model adopted was a hit. It demonstrated that it could be replicated
on a larger scale and that the Clear and Fertilize initiative was good at
stimulating action in areas of mini-holdings. António Macedo explains what, in his view, led to this initiative being
successful and highly-regarded by those who signed up to the programme.
“If ground is
cleared in accordance with technical recommendations the fire risk is decreased
by reducing the fuel load. This doesn’t mean that that plot of land can’t be
swept by a forest fire, but the risk is lowered. Even if that area does burn,
it is more resilient. It still burns, but its recovery is much faster.”
As well
decreasing the fire risk, the programme also allows productivity to be
increased. This could be the driving force to guarantee that this initiative
remains in operation for a long time. In the near future, if the results of the
programme are positive, and the timber imports are able to be reduced, CELPA’s
goal is to channel a part of that sum towards continuing with the initiative.
Indeed, with the restrictions on increasing new areas of eucalyptus, the
challenge is to increase productivity. Macedo assures us that “There is great
scope for improvement in existing eucalyptus forests”, and he cites the example
of what happened during five consecutive years in a network of permanent plots
which were subject to on-the-ground visits. 64% of those plots showed no signs
whatsoever of management having been carried out. This demonstrates how the
forest is neglected and explains low productivity.
Simple to
sign up
Forest
management pays off, and this programme helps to promote it. António Macedo believes that the two main aspects
of Clear and Fertilize are “there being no commitment to selling the timber,
and a removal of red tape in signing up for the programme, with no contractual
documentation, which greatly simplified the signing up process”.
The programme is only implemented in areas which are purely eucalyptus rather than a mixture of trees, and on land which is average to very good for eucalyptus cultivation
Further to these
two points, there is also the forest agents’ positive reaction towards the
advantages and benefits of “business” taking place, either for the loggers,
owners, forest producer associations and service providers, of appropriate interventions
being carried out, of case-specific good practices being implemented on each
property, and finally, of setting up a partnership for resuming forest
management.
The result of
the pilot projects undertaken in these areas was an eye-opener. The interventions
could clearly be seen in the form of cleared undergrowth of appropriate
density, which has a positive impact on the community.
Extending to
250,000 acres (100,000
hectares)
The Clear and
Fertilize project was created for mini-holdings and designed to be applied in
five regions. In accordance with CELPA’s inventory data, the programme is only
implemented in areas which are purely eucalyptus rather than a mixture of
trees, and on land which is average to very good for eucalyptus cultivation.
Our interviewee tells us “the earlier the intervention is carried out, the
better the results will be”. He explains that when resources are limited,
choices have to be made. On the land selected for intervention, not including
its own property managed directly by the industry, the existing area for the
enhancement programme includes over a million acres (411,000 hectares).
The forest is only given priority at election time
He was the Director-General of Forestry from 2002 to 2005. He gained this position not through political affiliation but on technical merit alone, which he had accrued at Soporcel. He acknowledges that it wasn’t an easy decision to switch jobs. “You give everything you’ve got, until there’s nothing more to give”. As always happens, the forest is always a priority at election time, but when it comes to taking action there are always other issues to deal with. With António Macedo, it was no different. He found a minister with other priorities within his Ministry. This was the case with Armando Sevinate Pinto, the minister for Agriculture, Rural Development and Fisheries from 2002 to July 2004. But after the major fires of 2003 which saw over a million acres (430,000 hectares) go up in flames, António Macedo says he witnessed the minister spending 70% of his time rethinking the forest and coming up with measures to prevent such an event being repeated. Many of the measures still in place came about at that time. One of them was the structural reform of the forestry sector which included the permanent management fund – provided through a fuel tax – GIFs (Major Forest Fires), and the management fund.
As a professional and technician, António Macedo thought it would be impossible to get any worse than the fires of 2003. Unfortunately, the events of 2017 showed how wrong he was.
The Clear and
Fertilize plan drawn up by CELPA, for a period of five years, aims to cover
250,000 acres (100,000 hectares of eucalyptus forest. António Macedo would like to go even further than
that, but his plan is very difficult to design and implement, particularly on
mini-holdings. We are at Year 0, and we still don’t have a real idea of how it
will be received and how the initiative will develop on the ground. For now, it
has been well received.
The impacts and benefits of the Clear and Fertilize programme are evident for all those involved, distributing wealth amongst the entire forestry industry
The programme
has already been put in place in three operating regions. This year each region
will have an area of around 5,000 acres (2,000 hectares), making a total
intervention of almost 15,000 acres (6,000 hectares). Next year this initiative
will be extended to two more regions, making a total area of 30,000 acres
(12,000 hectares), the year after that 37,000 acres (15,000 hectares) and the
following year 44,500 acres (18,000 hectares). It will follow an upward curve
until 2024, by which time the area covered by the Clear and Fertilize programme
will have totalled 250,000 acres (100,000 hectares).
Implementation
through partners
This is the
project that has been designed and approved by CELPA. On issues relating to the
methodology and process, CELPA will not be directly joining the operation with
owners, as the initiative is being implemented on the ground through a network
of partners. The association deems that the network or partners may be an
organisation of forest producers, a service provider, a logger or a forest
certification group. According to António Macedo, “All bodies which reach out to owners via their EAC business
activity and which may bring this initiative to them are of interest to us, to
form part of our network of partners”.
The impacts and
benefits of the Clear and Fertilize programme are evident for all those
involved, distributing wealth amongst the entire forestry industry. The
simplified signing-up procedure, with no red tape, enables owners to increase
productivity on their land which, in practice, translates into increased
revenue. More timber produced in the same area is also a positive thing for
loggers and service providers. Once cleared, the area will be more resilient to
fire, and there will be less land burnt and decreased losses. It is estimated
that there will be an increase of two million cubic metres between 2023 and
2033, which will allow for a portion of the timber imported to meet the
industry’s needs to be replaced by home-grown timber.
António Macedo knows that for the initiative to be
successful, it needs a good communication strategy, both inside and outside
companies. Partners therefore have to be carefully chosen to make up the
network, making sure to include bodies and companies which can see the benefits
of this initiative: “The partners mustn’t feel threatened by the industry or
compete with it. The industry has historically been very inward-looking,
focusing on its own needs and properties. This is a large-scale programme to
promote and increase the value of the forest which is in private hands, and
this may lead to some conflicts with service providers. We need to handle this issue
sensitively.”